Comments for Auditblogs.com http://auditblogs.com A little checking can\'t hurt, can it? Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:02:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 Comment on Spam Blogs by John A http://auditblogs.com/blog/2007/04/22/spam-blogs/#comment-237 John A Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:40:04 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2007/04/22/spam-blogs/#comment-237 A: Anything except yahoo, gmail and hotmail A: Anything except yahoo, gmail and hotmail

]]> Comment on Spam Blogs by Andrew http://auditblogs.com/blog/2007/04/22/spam-blogs/#comment-236 Andrew Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:47:54 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2007/04/22/spam-blogs/#comment-236 This wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that the sign up thingy refuses to give me a blog, would it? It just keeps saying it won't except that email address, no matter which I try! I've gone through my yahoo, gmail, and hotmail accounts already. What emails does it accept? This wouldn’t have anything to do with the fact that the sign up thingy refuses to give me a blog, would it? It just keeps saying it won’t except that email address, no matter which I try! I’ve gone through my yahoo, gmail, and hotmail accounts already. What emails does it accept?

]]> Comment on Spam Blogs by John A http://auditblogs.com/blog/2007/04/22/spam-blogs/#comment-210 John A Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:16:08 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2007/04/22/spam-blogs/#comment-210 Fair question. The answers are: 1. The blogs must be analytical, dealing with issues in science and economics. 2. They must not be designed purely for the purpose of gaming Google Adsense or similar with keywords. 3. The authors should be available to answer questions and comments. Clear? Fair question. The answers are:

1. The blogs must be analytical, dealing with issues in science and economics.
2. They must not be designed purely for the purpose of gaming Google Adsense or similar with keywords.
3. The authors should be available to answer questions and comments.

Clear?

]]> Comment on Spam Blogs by AutoBlogger http://auditblogs.com/blog/2007/04/22/spam-blogs/#comment-196 AutoBlogger Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:09:37 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2007/04/22/spam-blogs/#comment-196 I want to create some blogs on your site with relevant text and at random intervals. What is your criteria for deletion? I have a purpose too. Just dont want my blogs to be deleted. :-) I want to create some blogs on your site with relevant text and at random intervals.
What is your criteria for deletion?

I have a purpose too. Just dont want my blogs to be deleted. :-)

]]> Comment on Hello world! by John A http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-156 John A Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:45:48 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-156 Status is that Steve moved the domain climateaudit.org to the new IP address before the server has actually been moved. It's still on http://209.218.29.87/ for the moment. Later today it will be moved to the colocation datacenter and all will be (mostly) well again. Status is that Steve moved the domain climateaudit.org to the new IP address before the server has actually been moved. It’s still on http://209.218.29.87/ for the moment.

Later today it will be moved to the colocation datacenter and all will be (mostly) well again.

]]> Comment on Hello world! by John Baltutis http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-155 John Baltutis Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:40:04 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-155 What's the status on ClimateAudit? What’s the status on ClimateAudit?

]]> Comment on Announcing Auditblogs.com by Auditblogs.com » Blog Archive » Spam Blogs http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/11/announcing-auditblogscom/#comment-151 Auditblogs.com » Blog Archive » Spam Blogs Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:12:02 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/11/announcing-auditblogscom/#comment-151 [...] I don’t care. They get deleted on sight. Auditblogs.com has a purpose. [...] […] I don’t care. They get deleted on sight. Auditblogs.com has a purpose. […]

]]> Comment on Hello world! by John A http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-100 John A Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:24:26 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-100 Good spot, fFred. They have been marked as spam. Good spot, fFred. They have been marked as spam.

]]> Comment on Hello world! by Freddy http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-98 Freddy Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:18:21 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-98 Um, John, methinks aurelie, mikelis and annaliese don't quite fit ... Um, John, methinks aurelie, mikelis and annaliese don’t quite fit …

]]> Comment on Hello world! by John A http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-21 John A Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:38:08 +0000 http://auditblogs.com/blog/2006/12/09/hello-world/#comment-21 Done Done

]]>